Analysis Interview techniques
Context
The importance of the interview
was to get the opinion of someone from the country, and to understand why this
country has created a law which interferes with human rights. In addition I
think the interview served the importance of understanding why people from this
country find people of the gay community to be so wrong.
Purpose of interview
The purpose of the interview was
to enhance the audience understanding of the topic. To give the audience a
deeper understanding of what someone from the Russian community thinks about
the issue. The issue was about Russians illegalising public displays of
affection and infatuations from the gay community if this rule was broken there
would be serious consequences which may lead to death even. Furthermore to get
the audience to have an understanding of what the actually issue is coming from
an actual source. Another purpose of the interview was to get the opinion of
the interviewee, to get his view of people of the gay community showing public
affection in Russian and the consequence that could be brought to those of this
community showing their fondness publically. In addition I also think a purpose
of the interview was justification, for the interviewee to
justify his
accusations and views on this delicate issue.
Question types
Jon Snow askes his interviewee a
different range of questions to abstract information from the interviewee. He
uses tactics like suggestive questioning on the interviewee, Jon at some points
in the interview askes direct questions instead he implies things to abstract
information from the audience. For example he used the line ‘So what you are
saying is…’ this is a good tactic to use on you interviewee, because for
example if the topic that is being discussed is quite delicate you wouldn’t
want to offend your interviewee by asking a full on direct questions so making
implications would get around this problem. Furthermore I think Jon also used
suggestive questions to make the interviewee to reflect or better yet think of
what he was saying or accusing. Though this didn’t quit work with the
interviewee as he was very head strong, this was a good type of question to
ask.
Another tactic that Jon used in
the interview was he asked open questions, he asked questions which the
interviewee could expand and elaborate on to get more full on answers which
answered the questions more detailed. In addition asking open questions is a
good way to abstract more information from you interviewee about the chosen topic.
Though his questions seem to get lost in the interview due to the interviewee
being a bit full on and dominant in the interview. You could see that Jon was
developing his questions by asking more direct questions such as Do you agree? By
asking a direct question I think interviewee knew exactly what Jon was trying
to get at and out of him.
In the interview Jon didn’t
really ask multiple questions, however he used more singular questions rather
than keeping the questions coming he singled out his questions to give his
interviewee time to expand on his answers, I think by doing this he gave his
interviewee time to think about the question and time to breath. When Jon
wasn’t asking a question he was making general comments about the topic and
about the public’s thoughts on the subject but also the impact.
Structure
In the interview there wasn’t an
introduction to the person very much or to the topic so was very clear, what
the interview was about so you had to pick up on things within the interview
which reveal the topic. Instead of an introduction Jon opened with a quote/statement
‘Do you agree? He uses this starter to ease the interviewer into the serious
topic about to be touched on. From this opening the interviewer then starts to
develop and establish more of his questions trying to get to the heart of the
topic. Towards the end of the interview Jon winds up the interview with a
verbal cue saying ‘Okay we are going to wrap it up’, this is a polite way of
Jon cutting off the interviewee and hinting that this is the end of the
interview.
Communication skills
In the
interview there was little communication that was going on but there was some
sense of communication. Jon showed active listening skills by using hand
gestures to show his understanding of the topic and nodding of his head to
indicate whether he agreed or not with the interviewee’s comments or opinion.
Also in the interview he had a very professional posture which indicated that
this was a serious topic and not a conversation. In the interview Jon would
lean forward or nod to put emphasis on his point. I also noticed that in the
interview Jon was directly facing the interviewee; this was because the
interview was held
between two people so it was very direct and focused.
Telephone techniques to obtain comments or
gather information
There wasn’t many telephone
techniques used to obtain comments or gather information from the interviewee.
But Jon would repeat his questions once or twice to the interviewee so that he
could get the answer to his questions. Though the interviewee would either go
off the topic or not answer the question Jon would repeated the question so
that he could get the answer which he was looking for. Jon would also be quite
persistent with his questions, when the interviewee would talk on or go off
topic Jon would try to bring the subject back to the topic very often. His
constant questions conveyed that he was bias on the topic you could see that he
had an opinion of his own.